The rules screen says 100%. The enumeration says 99.9720%
Register at DuelOpens the Duel signup. 18+.
Two numbers are in public, and they are not the same sentence. The in-game rules, version v1.4, state 100% RTP for the base game and for free spins. A later enumeration of every one of the 2^32 spin outcomes, built only from the published weights and paytable, gets 99.9720%. A 30 million spin simulation got 100.06%, which sits inside the noise of that enumeration. Read 18 October 2026 from the public audit.
The gap from 100 to 99.9720 is 0.028 percentage points of house edge inside the math itself. It is not a session promise in either direction. A hundred spins can still finish at a loss on both figures.
| Rules screen v1.4 | 100% stated for base game and free spins |
|---|---|
| Enumerated RTP | 99.9720% |
| 30 million spins | 100.06% |
| Bonus buy | 99.9997% of the 125x price |
| After $50,000 in a day | A published payout edge from 0.01% to 1.84% |
How the 2^32 count was made is on the enumeration page. The 125x buy is on its own page because its return is 99.9997%, not 99.9720%. The daily cap is a third number, and it was not played in the captured bets.
Questions
Did the rules lie?
They state 100%. The enumeration of the published weights gets 99.9720%. Both sentences are dated above. They are not the same measurement.
Does 100.06% in the simulation beat the enumeration?
No. It is a sample. The enumeration is the full set of outcomes.
Is 99.9720% a promise I lose 0.028% tonight?
No. That is the long-run edge inside the math. One session moves much more than that.